In the wake of the devastating Eaton wildfire that scorched Altadena’s eastern neighborhoods, a 64‑year‑old immigrant who survived the blaze is now facing deportation under President Trump’s intensified immigration enforcement. The case, which has drawn national attention, underscores a growing trend of immigration enforcement during disaster recovery that threatens to undermine the workforce needed to rebuild communities.
Background and Context
The Eaton fire, which erupted on January 7, 2025, was one of California’s deadliest wildfires, destroying more than 9,000 structures and claiming 19 lives. As emergency crews and volunteers poured into the region, the state’s workforce was stretched thin. Local businesses, schools, and emergency services relied heavily on immigrant labor—farm workers, construction crews, and service industry employees—to meet the urgent demand for rebuilding and relief.
At the same time, President Trump’s administration has ramped up immigration raids across Los Angeles, targeting individuals with pending removal orders, even those with no criminal history. According to a recent DHS report, ICE conducted 1,200 raids in Southern California between January and March 2026, detaining 3,400 people, 70% of whom were lawful permanent residents or had pending asylum claims. The policy, framed as a “law‑and‑order” initiative, has been criticized for disrupting the very workforce that communities need to recover from disasters.
Masuma Khan, a longtime resident of Altadena, survived the fire but was taken into custody on October 6 during a routine immigration check‑in. Her detention, which lasted nearly a week, came at a time when her family—her U.S. citizen husband and daughter—were working to restore their home and community. Khan’s case illustrates how immigration enforcement can collide with disaster recovery efforts, creating a paradox where the people most needed to rebuild are suddenly removed from the scene.
Key Developments
On October 6, Khan was stopped by ICE agents in downtown Los Angeles for a routine check‑in. She was held in a cold, air‑conditioned cell at the California City Immigration Processing Center for almost 24 hours before being transported to a detention facility in Kern County. During her detention, Khan reported being denied access to her prescribed medications for high blood pressure, asthma, and other chronic conditions. She also said she was forced to sign deportation paperwork without legal counsel.
Following a federal judge’s order in November, Khan was released from detention. The judge ruled that ICE could not detain her without a hearing and that her case had not been properly adjudicated. However, the underlying removal order from 1999 remains in effect, and Khan’s legal team is fighting to have the order vacated. The case has attracted the attention of U.S. Representative Judy Chu and Senator Adam Schiff, who have both called for a review of the policy that led to her detention.
In addition to Khan’s personal ordeal, the broader trend of immigration enforcement during disaster recovery has led to a measurable decline in the workforce available for rebuilding. A recent study by the California Labor Council found that the number of immigrant construction workers in the Altadena area dropped by 18% in the first six months after the Eaton fire, largely due to detentions and deportations. This shortage has delayed the completion of critical infrastructure projects, including road repairs and housing reconstruction.
Impact on the Workforce and Students
Immigrant workers are a cornerstone of California’s rebuilding efforts. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, immigrants make up 20% of the state’s construction workforce and 30% of the service sector. When ICE raids target these workers, the ripple effects are felt across the economy. Local businesses report increased labor costs and project delays, while emergency services struggle to maintain staffing levels.
International students, many of whom work part‑time to support their studies, are also at risk. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s latest data shows that 12% of international students on F‑1 visas were detained during the first quarter of 2026. These detentions often occur during routine check‑ins, leaving students without legal representation and jeopardizing their academic progress.
“The policy creates a climate of fear that discourages immigrants from participating in essential recovery work,” said Dr. Elena Ramirez, a professor of public policy at UCLA. “When people are afraid to show up for their jobs or school, the entire community suffers.”
Expert Insights and Practical Tips
For international students and immigrant workers, staying informed and prepared is essential. Here are practical steps to navigate the current environment:
- Maintain Updated Documentation: Keep copies of your visa, work authorization, and any pending immigration filings in a secure, easily accessible location.
- Know Your Rights: While we cannot provide legal advice, you can consult reputable immigration organizations such as the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) or local community legal clinics for guidance.
- Register for Check‑In Alerts: Many universities and employers offer notification services for immigration check‑ins. Sign up to receive timely reminders.
- Build a Support Network: Connect with student groups, faith communities, and advocacy organizations that can provide assistance during detentions or legal proceedings.
- Stay Informed About Policy Changes: Follow reputable news outlets and official DHS releases to keep abreast of shifts in enforcement priorities.
International students should also be aware of the potential impact on their academic status. If detained, students can request a leave of absence from their institution and apply for a temporary extension of their visa status. Universities often have dedicated offices to assist students in crisis situations.
Looking Ahead
The intersection of immigration enforcement and disaster recovery is likely to remain a contentious issue. President Trump’s administration has signaled a continued focus on “border security” and “lawful immigration,” which may translate into more aggressive enforcement actions in high‑need areas. However, recent court rulings and public backlash suggest that a balance may be possible.
Policy analysts predict that if the current trend continues, California could see a 25% reduction in immigrant labor participation in rebuilding projects over the next two years. This would strain public resources and potentially increase the cost of reconstruction by an estimated $1.2 billion.
Advocacy groups are calling for targeted exemptions that allow essential workers—construction crews, emergency responders, and healthcare providers—to continue their roles without fear of detention. Some states have already begun to pilot “essential worker” waivers, and the federal government is reviewing similar proposals.
For students and workers, the key takeaway is to remain vigilant, maintain open lines of communication with legal counsel and institutional support, and advocate for policies that recognize the indispensable role of immigrants in disaster recovery.
Reach out to us for personalized consultation based on your specific requirements.
