Federal funding cuts threaten the rapid growth of Los Angeles’ defense‑tech sector, as the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program—long a lifeline for startups—expired last month amid a stalled congressional debate. The pause comes at a time when President Trump’s administration is pushing for faster weapons development and a greater role for private‑sector innovation in national security.
Background and Context
Los Angeles has become a hotbed for defense technology, with companies like Gambit, Anduril Industries, K2 Space, and Apex Space turning the city into a “mini‑Silicon Valley for defense.” The region’s boom is fueled by a mix of venture capital, military contracts, and federal seed funding. The SBIR program, administered by the Small Business Administration (SBA), has historically provided up to $4 billion annually to small firms developing technology that can be adopted by the Department of Defense (DoD) and other federal agencies.
In September, the program’s funding expired because lawmakers could not agree on reforms. Senator Joni Ernst (R‑Iowa) proposed a $75‑million lifetime cap for individual companies and stricter due‑diligence rules to prevent foreign influence, while Senator Ed Markey (D‑Mass.) argued the changes would stifle innovation. The Senate’s failure to reauthorize the program left a funding vacuum that has already begun to ripple through the local ecosystem.
Key Developments
Gambit, a North Hollywood startup founded by former SpaceX engineer Josh Giegel, received $3.3 million in SBIR funding in 2024 and was counting on an additional $5 million from the Air Force. “That funding really helps companies like ours that are putting tech into warfighters’ hands,” Giegel told the Los Angeles Times. Without it, Gambit faces “more leg work to find other sources.”
Other firms are feeling the pinch. Anduril Industries, headquartered in Costa Mesa, has raised more than $30 billion in total funding but has seen its recent rounds slowed by the lack of SBIR backing. K2 Space in Torrance and Apex Space in Los Angeles, both satellite platform developers, have paused prototype development due to cash flow constraints. The SpaceWERX program, which distributes SBA funds to defense startups, reported that $94 million in larger contracts has been held up for over 25 companies since September.
According to the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine, one dollar of SBIR funding attracts more than four dollars of venture capital or other third‑party investment. The loss of this multiplier effect is already visible in the capital‑raising landscape, with several venture funds citing the funding gap as a reason to delay or reduce commitments to defense tech.
Impact Analysis
For the Los Angeles defense‑tech community, the funding cuts mean slower product development, potential layoffs, and a chilling effect on new entrants. A recent survey of 71 California defense firms—awarded $173 million in contracts through SpaceWERX in 2024—found that 38% had to postpone or cancel projects due to cash constraints. The ripple extends beyond the companies themselves: suppliers, contractors, and even local universities that partner on research projects are feeling the strain.
From a national security perspective, the pause could delay the deployment of critical technologies. President Trump’s “Arsenal of Freedom” initiative relies on private‑sector speed to field new capabilities. The current funding uncertainty threatens to undermine that strategy, potentially leaving the U.S. at a disadvantage in emerging domains such as autonomous systems, hypersonic weapons, and AI‑driven battlefield management.
For investors, the market volatility is a warning sign. The loss of SBIR’s “first‑touch” signal—where a federal award signals viability—means venture capitalists must rely more heavily on proprietary due diligence, increasing risk and potentially raising the cost of capital for defense startups.
Expert Insights and Practical Tips
“The SBIR program is a critical bridge between early‑stage innovation and large‑scale deployment,” says Dr. Maya Patel, director of the Defense Innovation Unit (DIU). “Without it, the pipeline dries up.” Patel recommends that companies diversify funding sources:
- Seek direct DoD contracts through the Defense Innovation Unit or the Army’s Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program, which has separate funding streams.
- Leverage state‑level incentives, such as California’s Emerging Technology Fund, which offers grants and tax credits for defense‑related research.
- Build strategic partnerships with larger defense contractors that can provide milestone payments and technical support.
Venture capitalists are also adapting. “We’re now looking at longer‑term, equity‑based investments rather than short‑term seed rounds,” notes Alex Kim, partner at Shield Capital. Kim advises startups to prepare for a more rigorous due‑diligence process, including detailed risk assessments and clear exit strategies.
For entrepreneurs, the key is resilience. “If you’re in the Los Angeles defense tech space, you need to have a contingency plan for funding gaps,” says Giegel. He added that building a diversified investor base—including angel investors, corporate venture arms, and international partners—can mitigate the impact of federal funding volatility.
Looking Ahead
Negotiations on Capitol Hill have restarted, but no consensus has emerged on whether the SBIR program will be reauthorized or restructured. The Senate’s current focus is on balancing national security concerns with the need to foster innovation. If the program is restored, it could come with new eligibility criteria and performance benchmarks, potentially tightening the flow of funds but also ensuring better alignment with defense priorities.
In the meantime, the DoD is exploring alternative funding mechanisms. The Defense Innovation Unit’s “Rapid Innovation Fund” and the Army’s “Innovation Investment Fund” are designed to provide more flexible, faster funding for high‑risk, high‑reward projects. These programs, however, are still in early stages and may not fully replace the SBIR’s reach.
For the Los Angeles defense‑tech sector, the next few months will be critical. Companies that can pivot quickly, secure alternative financing, and demonstrate clear value to the DoD will likely weather the storm. Those that cannot may face layoffs, project cancellations, or even exit the market.
As the federal funding debate continues, stakeholders across the ecosystem—startups, investors, universities, and policymakers—must collaborate to ensure that Los Angeles remains a leading hub for defense innovation.
Reach out to us for personalized consultation based on your specific requirements.
