In a dramatic turn of events, the Delhi High Court has been summoned by Rani Kapur, the widow of late industrialist Dr. Surinder Kapur, in a high‑profile case alleging a Rani Kapur lawsuit trust fraud orchestrated by her son’s third wife, Priya Kapur. The suit claims that a newly created “RK Family Trust” siphoned off the entire estate of the late Dr. Kapur, diverting control of the Sona Group’s flagship companies and leaving the senior citizen mother bereft of her rightful assets.
Background and Context
Dr. Surinder Kapur, founder of the Sona Group—a conglomerate with interests ranging from steel manufacturing to real‑estate development—passed away in June 2015. His will, dated February 2013, bequeathed all movable and immovable assets, including a 35% stake in Sona Group’s listed entities, exclusively to his wife, Rani Kapur. The will was probated in January 2016 without objection from their three children, including the late Sunjay Kapur.
In September 2017, Rani Kapur suffered a debilitating stroke, rendering her physically and emotionally dependent on her son Sunjay and his third wife, Priya. According to the plaint, the defendants exploited this vulnerability to establish the “RK Family Trust” on 26 October 2017, a deed that allegedly transferred all of Rani’s assets into the trust without her informed consent.
Prior to the alleged fraud, Rani had already set up two legitimate trusts in 2016—the Dr. SK Family Trust and the MK Family Trust—under which she remained the settlor and principal beneficiary. The sudden emergence of the RK Family Trust, which did not list her as a beneficiary, raised immediate red flags.
Key Developments in the Case
The lawsuit, filed with the Delhi High Court on 21 January 2026, seeks a declaration that the RK Family Trust is illegal, void, and a product of fraud, forgery, and undue influence. The plaint outlines several critical points:
- Forgery Allegations: Forensic analysis of the trust deed indicates that the initials attributed to Rani Kapur are inconsistent with her contemporaneous signatures, suggesting forgery.
- Undue Influence: The defendants allegedly leveraged Rani’s medical condition to secure her signature on the trust deed, which was never provided to her during Sunjay’s lifetime.
- Asset Diversion: The trust purportedly made Sunjay the sole lifetime beneficiary, with subsequent benefits flowing to Priya and her children, effectively excluding Rani and her daughters.
- Corporate Control: Within days of Sunjay’s death in June 2025, Priya allegedly secured key managerial and board positions in core Sona Group companies, a move that the plaintiff claims was pre‑planned to consolidate control.
- Digital Manipulation: Rani’s access to company information was allegedly cut off by falsely claiming her email account was compromised, while a fictitious email ID was created in her name to validate trust‑related actions.
Rani Kapur also requests the court to dissolve the RK Family Trust, cancel statutory filings under the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, and order a full rendition of accounts since 2017. The suit further seeks permanent injunctions preventing the defendants from operating trust bank accounts, exercising digital signatures in her name, or representing themselves as trustees.
Impact on Stakeholders and the Broader Business Community
While the case centers on a single family’s estate, its ramifications ripple across India’s corporate and legal landscapes. For shareholders of Sona Group, the dispute raises questions about governance and succession planning. Analysts estimate that the Sona Group’s market capitalization stands at approximately ₹45,000 crore, with the disputed 35% stake valued at around ₹15,750 crore.
For families with significant business holdings, the case underscores the importance of transparent estate planning. “This lawsuit highlights how vulnerable even high‑net‑worth individuals can be to internal conspiracies,” notes Dr. Anil Mehta, a senior partner at the law firm Gupta & Associates. “It serves as a cautionary tale for families to maintain rigorous documentation and independent oversight of trusts.”
Students and young professionals studying corporate law or finance may find the case illustrative of the intersection between family dynamics and corporate governance. The legal proceedings could set precedents for how courts interpret trust deeds and assess allegations of undue influence.
Expert Insights and Practical Guidance
While we are not providing legal advice, several best‑practice recommendations emerge from the case:
- Independent Verification: Ensure that all trust documents are independently verified by a reputable notary or legal professional before execution.
- Regular Audits: Conduct periodic audits of trust accounts and corporate filings to detect any irregularities early.
- Clear Succession Plans: Draft explicit succession plans that delineate control mechanisms and dispute resolution procedures.
- Digital Security: Implement robust cybersecurity protocols, including multi‑factor authentication, to prevent unauthorized access to corporate and personal accounts.
- Professional Oversight: Engage third‑party advisors—such as independent trustees or corporate governance consultants—to monitor trust activities.
Financial planners and estate attorneys often advise clients to maintain separate legal entities for business and personal assets. “Segregating assets can reduce the risk of cross‑contamination in the event of a dispute,” says Ms. Kavita Rao, a senior advisor at WealthGuard Advisory.
Looking Ahead: Potential Outcomes and Industry Implications
The Delhi High Court is expected to schedule a hearing in the coming weeks. If the court finds the RK Family Trust void, it could trigger a cascade of asset re‑allocation, potentially restoring Rani Kapur’s control over the Sona Group’s holdings. Conversely, a ruling in favor of the defendants could embolden similar schemes in other family‑run conglomerates.
From a regulatory standpoint, the case may prompt the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) to revisit guidelines on insider control and trust structures. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) could also issue clarifications on digital signature usage in trust deeds.
For the broader business community, the lawsuit serves as a reminder that robust governance frameworks are essential, especially in family‑owned enterprises. Companies may increasingly adopt formal board structures, independent directors, and transparent disclosure practices to mitigate internal conflicts.
Reach out to us for personalized consultation based on your specific requirements.
